The Real Con | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Tom Ponessa (tomp![]() |
|
Date: 10 Jun 1995 21:32:32 GMT |
I know I'm going to regret this. Harry warns about building with straw on the basis of a book review. Not on the basis of reading the book. Not on the basis of building with straw. And he doesn't explain his cryptic assertion that straw may have a more negative impact environmentally. The figures given in the book represent contractors being used for both types of construction. There are significant savings to be had in material costs so if sweat equity is involved, money will be saved. Straw is a waste product that is burned off in many places. Wood framing comes from oxygen producing trees. Insulation is generally non-renewable and often toxic. Using straw prevents the burn off, saves a few trees, and insulates very well (saving fuel and more pollution). Starw is available every year. Trees take a little longer. Who's conning who? Tom
-
The Real Con Tom Ponessa, June 10 1995
- Re: The Real Con Harry Pasternak, June 12 1995
- The Real Con TIM HEUSER, June 13 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.