Building Community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: BPaiss (BPaiss![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:26:08 -0500 |
Dear Friends bothe Old and New, I have just pored through the weeks digests and am left with the profound feeling that we are stuck. It is obious that the most significant thing that peole left the conferece with was what occured in the last 45 minutes of (for some of us) a 4 1/2 day event. No doubt it was powerful and for that reason alone I would do it again...but please what did you think of the rest of the time we spent together? (Other than that Mrs. Lincoln what did you think of the play?) I would love to hear some discussion about the presentations, the networking, the food, the tours, the resource room, the tone of the time we spend together, the new connections which were made, the new insights which were gained. From my perspective, a lot happened for alot of people and all we seem to be discussion is this and a new form of strawbale sheetrock!!!!! Dan's suggest that we stick to "Base Model CoHousing" is ignoring the fact that group decision making and values (translated into specific options) are mutually exclusive. I don't expect to see a coho commuinity with that kind of focus until a professional team creates a spec project and for one would think twice about wanting to live there. Rob commented that the reality is that "Every cohousing group is exclusionary. You exclude those who do not want to live cooperatively. You exclude those who are not interested in caring about their neighbors, you exclude those who are unwilling to give up total personal automony. Gary from Broward Commons added that "If muslim or all catholic cohousing communities started popping up, the movement will be in trouble. I would encourage all of us to review the four aspects Chuck and Katie layued out in the book as too what make something CoHousing. Resident Participation, Design to encourage community, common facilities, and resident managed. As long as a project has those factors it can be CoHousing. It says noithing about diversity, affordability, energy efficiency, religious orientation and form of decision making. We have added all that ourselves. How can we possibly come to the conclusion that if a group of people want a non-diverse, religious community that it isn't cohousing? I totally agree with Rob when he says, "I for one would be interested to see how a republican conservative christian group would make decisions. I would love to learn how low income black woman would use a commonhouse and what sorts of sharing they did. The diversity within these groups can teach many things." I ultimately expect that we will be able to use our differences to strengthen all of us a community which for me, is why I am doing this in the first place. Just some thoughts...thanks for listening. Zev
-
Building Community BPaiss, October 14 1995
- Re: Building Community Valerie Stuart, October 17 1995
- Re: Building Community Madeline Finch, October 17 1995
- Re: Building Community Tbeni, October 17 1995
- Re: Building Community Bruce Koller, October 17 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.