Local businesses as alternatives to commuting | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Gear (catalyst![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 16:50:32 -0600 |
Someone wrote: >There are three ways that come to mind to reduce commuting: > >1. Locate cohousing near employment >2. Incorporate telecommuting centers and technology into cohousing >3. Develop local businesses > >Number 1 is difficult because of the high market price of developable land >near labor markets. Number 2 might not be practical unless some corporate >sponsorship could be obtained. However, in regard to Number 3, I see no >reason why motivated people could not develop cooperative small-scale >businesses, taking advantage of the opportunities provided by new >technologies for remote education, entertainment, and mail order. As I am currently very involved in transporation issues I feel I should comment. *Be careful* about assumptions that home-based businesses reduce the number of trips. I work as an independent consultant from my home and my single-occupancy-vehicle (SOV) trips have increased as a result. Although I don't have a predictable daily commute, I *often* find myself going to meet with clients all over the metro area. The local Regional Transportation Council head told me that this pattern is repeated everywhere; telecommuters take more SOV trips than anyone else! When they do leave the house they are as likely to be going to odd places not well served by transit or to be travelling at off-peak hours when the commuter runs are no longer in service. Some local businesses use flextime and such but the predominant result is to reduce the peak pressure on the roads but not the total demand. In fact, I think the overall number of trips is increased because flextime means that *everyone* comes and goes alone, rather than being able to use mass transit. (Psychologically, people don't feel they are taking advantage of flextime if they don't vary their hours--and once enough people vary the hours enough the possibility of serving that trip demand with mass transit is reduced.) That's not to discourage co-locating business and home but I suggest being very careful about assuming that home or coho-based businesses will reduce the transit/transport burden. While we're on the subject though, I thought I would share an idea I came across recently that I think is real relevant to cohousing, especially the urban kind. THe point the speaker made was that "The most environmentally responsible thing we can do--and the most critical thing we must do--is figure out how to make cities affordable, livable, and enjoyable. If they are, we will relieve the pressure to convert farm and forest into tract developments. If we don't, we can forget trying to preserve any farms or wilderness near urban areas, as the people leaving the city will continue to relentlessly sprawl outward." John Gear (catalyst [at] pacifier.com) The Bill of Rights -- The ORIGINAL Contract with America Beware of Imitations. Accept No Substitutes. Insist on the Genuine Articles.
-
Local businesses as alternatives to commuting John Gear, January 25 1996
- Re: Local businesses as alternatives to commuting William Thornton, January 26 1996
- Re: Local businesses as alternatives to commuting Shava Nerad, January 26 1996
- Re: Local businesses as alternatives to commuting JPCOACH, January 26 1996
- Re: Local businesses as alternatives to commuting Joe Rooney, January 28 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.