Re: Local businesses as alternatives to commuting | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: William Thornton (William_Thornton![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 11:13:07 -0600 |
Thanks to John Gear <catalyst [at] pacifier.com> for a thought-provoking and thoughtful response. I write instructional materials for high-tech companies and have worked at home since 1985. We are managing with a new baby and a single car, because I only go to work twice a week. The point about people dodging rush hour frustrating mass transit, is true, though. That is clearly what I do, and, yes, I'm alone in my car when I do go. What I'm thinking of is designing businesses from the start with a major goal of getting out of automobiles and staying at home. A pop-economics book called Megatrends by Naisbitt got me thinking a long time ago that as the value of information as a commodity increases, the potential of making a living through online transactions grows. Naisbitt wrote a long time before anyone thought of cyberspace, but the trend seems inevitable. With the opportunities in online education, financial services, mailorder, and entertainment, what real economic need is there to get in a car? Why not combine the high-tech with high-touch, as Naisbitt suggested? Liberal shitkickers in cyberspace unite! There are many business opportunities just in organic agriculture for applying networking technology to coordinating sources of growing stock, technological information, organic pest control (hurray for nematode spray!), markets and products, with emerging specialty crops like margosa, herbs, bamboo, or whatever (legalize hemp!). I'm not very well informed in current developments, but you get the idea. (I'm new to the netas a userand I still need to get on econet and the other sources that I know that exist to inform me better. ) What I'm describing is the kind of economic activity that I'd like to see provide the economic basis for cohousing, rather than suburban commuter lifestyles. I'm suggesting that we shouldn't be in a hurry to site cohousing communities, when in the long run it might be easier on us and the environment to get our economic act together first. Personally, I hesitate to get locked into a long-term loan propping up high property values based on commuter culture. That is why I'm a lurker, and I bet there are many lurkers out there in similar circumstances. Ultimately, land is worth the food (or other renewable resources) that you can get off it. Why pay more when there are so many online ways to supplement income from the land? (Certainly, I'm not ready for a return to subsistence agriculture). Of course in realtime, I still have to meet my clients, but that is because I'm sucking hard on the corporate teat (yum, yum!). If I can get my educational business into cyberspace and broaden my clientele so I don't have to suck so hard in one place, I think the need for warm and fuzzy meetings will be reduced (with what they're paying me, I don't blame them if they want to see my face now and then!). But getting out of my car isn't enough if my little family is all alone in our little house in Castro Valley. My inner child (and my 4-month outer child) needs a cooperative farm and flesh-and-blood playmates, not computer games. Of course, my wife hates computers! Which is why I'm on the COHOUSING-L list and she's playing with the baby! Regards, William
-
Local businesses as alternatives to commuting John Gear, January 25 1996
- Re: Local businesses as alternatives to commuting William Thornton, January 26 1996
- Re: Local businesses as alternatives to commuting Shava Nerad, January 26 1996
- Re: Local businesses as alternatives to commuting JPCOACH, January 26 1996
- Re: Local businesses as alternatives to commuting Joe Rooney, January 28 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.