| Re: "corporate" form question | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Harrianne Mills (mills |
|
| Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:39:45 -0600 | |
David: I will DEFINITELY check the cohousing-L archives, and yes, we are a
San Francisco Bay Area (Middle Peninsula) group, entitled PERCH
(PEninsula Region CoHousing). Take a look at our web page --
http://www.cohousing.org/specific/sf_peninsular/
Harrianne
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, David Mandel wrote:
> Harrianne:
>
> It depends very much what stage you're at, what state you're in and most of
> all, a lot of details regarding the makeup of your group and what you're
> trying to accomplish. For a good start, see the summary of the session on
> this topic from the Seattle conference when it comes out (soon, I presume).
> There's also been some good discussion on this list in the past. Check the
> archives. From your address, I assume you're in California (for future
> reference, it's a good idea to identify your location and group when you
> put something up on the list). Tell me some more about your group and I can
> offer some more specific advice.
>
> David, Sacramento
>
> >I would be VERY interested in hearing out about various cohousing groups'
> >experiences with being classified as a (limited?) partnership vs. a
> >(non-profit?) corporation (s-corp, c-corp, etc.). The pluses? The minuses?
> >Is life any easier either way? And THANKS for your help! Harrianne
>
- Re: "corporate" form question, (continued)
- Re: "corporate" form question Jim Nordgaard, October 28 1997
- Re: "corporate" form question Sanda Everette, October 28 1997
- Re: Re: "corporate" form question JoycePlath, October 29 1997
- Re: "corporate" form question David Mandel, October 30 1997
- Re: "corporate" form question Harrianne Mills, October 30 1997
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.