Re: "corporate" form question | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Harrianne Mills (mills![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:39:45 -0600 |
David: I will DEFINITELY check the cohousing-L archives, and yes, we are a San Francisco Bay Area (Middle Peninsula) group, entitled PERCH (PEninsula Region CoHousing). Take a look at our web page -- http://www.cohousing.org/specific/sf_peninsular/ Harrianne ---------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, David Mandel wrote: > Harrianne: > > It depends very much what stage you're at, what state you're in and most of > all, a lot of details regarding the makeup of your group and what you're > trying to accomplish. For a good start, see the summary of the session on > this topic from the Seattle conference when it comes out (soon, I presume). > There's also been some good discussion on this list in the past. Check the > archives. From your address, I assume you're in California (for future > reference, it's a good idea to identify your location and group when you > put something up on the list). Tell me some more about your group and I can > offer some more specific advice. > > David, Sacramento > > >I would be VERY interested in hearing out about various cohousing groups' > >experiences with being classified as a (limited?) partnership vs. a > >(non-profit?) corporation (s-corp, c-corp, etc.). The pluses? The minuses? > >Is life any easier either way? And THANKS for your help! Harrianne >
- Re: "corporate" form question, (continued)
- Re: "corporate" form question Jim Nordgaard, October 28 1997
- Re: "corporate" form question Sanda Everette, October 28 1997
- Re: Re: "corporate" form question JoycePlath, October 29 1997
- Re: "corporate" form question David Mandel, October 30 1997
- Re: "corporate" form question Harrianne Mills, October 30 1997
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.