Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Willits (dwn2erth![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 09:31:01 -0500 |
I have to agree with robin ellison. the continued suburban sprawl with "hip" new packaging ..."cohousing" is still just traditional suburban sprawl. Urban restoration and village revitalization is the real need and the unit costs can be very low by selecting the neighborhood. The economic impact of a similar group investment into an existing neighborhood would be very significant and could change the course of history for a particular neighborhood. jim willits http//www.bioactive.com http//willits [at] bioactive.com ---------- > From: Robin D. Ellison <Robin.D.Ellison [at] Dartmouth.EDU> > Subject: RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness > Date: Thursday, May 14, 1998 9:48 AM > > --- Deb Smyre wrote: > One question is can't the benefits of co-housing be duplicated within any single-family community via block-clubs, backyard barbeques, shared child-care, co-op food buying, etc. The questions seem to revolve around whether the old-fashioned approaches to achieving a sense of community aren't just as effective as co-housing, > --- end of quote --- > > --- Lynn Nadeau wrote: > The trick is to create opportunities to be together, around stuff that people have to > do anyway. > --- end of quote --- > > I think the "bumper sticker" answer here is that cars kill neighborliness. > > In my non co-housing experience [and I would be happy to share this] neighborliness is directly related to the amount of casual contact one has with the neighbors. That contact is directly related to how much people walk in the neighborhood. How much people walk in a neighborhood is directly related to the use of cars. > > Co housing encourages pedestrian traffic by excluding cars for the center of the community. This is not the only difference between co-housing and conventional neighborhoods, but it is the most clear one your fellow students can see, and the hardest to address in a conventional neighborhood. > > I think if one were to close a block to car traffic that very soon neighborliness would increase noticeably. If one were then to focus on block parties and pot luck dinners, what you would have would be very close to co-housing [maybe just one common house short :-) ]. > > > happy trails > Robin Ellison > Hartland VT. >
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness, (continued)
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness James Nordgaard, May 13 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Lynn Nadeau, May 13 1998
- RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Robin D. Ellison, May 14 1998
- RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Rob Sandelin, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Robin D. Ellison, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.