Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Willits (dwn2erth![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 10:21:33 -0500 |
high density townhouse projects are high density townhouse projects regardless of who lives in them... and, developed farmland and or open space is developed farmland or open space. no longer being what it was before it was developed..all neighborhoods built before the twenties were pedestrian.. jim willits http//www.bioactive.com http//willits [at] bioactive.com ---------- > From: Robin D. Ellison <Robin.D.Ellison [at] Dartmouth.EDU> > Subject: Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness > Date: Thursday, May 14, 1998 11:11 AM > > --- jim willits wrote: > I have to agree with robin ellison. the continued suburban sprawl with > "hip" new packaging ..."cohousing" is still just traditional suburban > sprawl. Urban restoration and village revitalization is the real need > --- end of quote --- > Thank you for agreeing with me, but I'm afraid that is not the point I was making. > > For one, I ' don't think co-housing is "just traditional suburban sprawl." From what I've heard co-housing is quite often done in neighborhood or even urban settings. The housing is most often more dense than any "suburban sprawl, " due partly to the pedestrian nature of co-housing. > > I do think you are right that retrofitting old neighborhoods and village centers is a great way to go, but I don't expect to see that till we have people of more moderate means taking up co-housing. > > My feeling is that people do co-housing for personal reasons, not primarily ideological reasons, so they will pick what they think is the nicest, and most convenient site they can afford [and everyone has different criteria]. > > I think the best way to attract people to " urban restoration and village revitalization" is to make those site more desirable to the people you want to live there. I think co-housing is one of those ways. It is also possible that if one "quieted" traffic [redesigning streets with plantings and pedestrian space so that traffic moves at 10-15 MPH], as they do in some cities in Europe, that those neighborhoods would become highly desirable. > > It is a fascinating topic, and I think more suited for an urban renewal discussion not necessarily co-housing. > > happy trails > Robin Ellison > Hartland VT
- RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness, (continued)
- RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Rob Sandelin, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Robin D. Ellison, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Roman Bitner, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness dwn2erth, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jennifer S. Stevens, May 14 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.