Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Willits (dwn2erth![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 09:47:02 -0500 |
rob sandelin , give me a break ... "strangers stand out like beacons" please.... sounds like jingoism of the highest order or maybe i mean odor... i have also never been impressed by the " relationship building" that goes on in either type of community. and gee... let's not forget to be sure to exclude low income families and protect market values for our little pieces of the pie.. every time i read the sandelin letter over I still can't tell if he is being serious or sarcastic. especially since we all love meetings so much especially about such burning issues as cohousing maintenance costs and common room usage. jim willits http//www.bioactive.com http//willits [at] bioactive.com ---------- > From: Rob Sandelin <Floriferous [at] classic.msn.com> > Subject: RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness > Date: Thursday, May 14, 1998 10:23 AM > > Cohousing is intentional community, the people who work together to create it > and live in it do so for a specific purpose, to increase the community in > their lives. You specifically make a commitment to that purpose when you join > a cohousing community, and the whole neighborhood works together to acheive > the goals of community. There are no strangers living in an intentional > community, and visitors and strangers stand out like beacons. You know > everyone, usually much deeper than is normal for neighbors in America. > > In community there is a significant personal commitment required to the group. > This is measured by responsibilities and caring for one another. > > Traditional neighborhoods are not intentional. People typically do not move > there to create more community in their lives, and typically only some of the > neighbors work together to create community. There is no commitment to the > group required, a seldom is it acheived. > > Gated communities are designed to isolate and insulate. Cohousing is designed > for collaboration and cooperation. They are private, in the same way that > gated communities are, however their purpose is to build relationships, not > isolate. They each do exclude however. Cohousing and Gated communities tend to > be market rate and above housing and so they exclude low incomes. Cohousing > excludes people who can't work well with others, or have a low tolerance for > meetings. Other than that, they are very different in intentions and > functions. > > Rob Sandelin > Sharingwood > A place with an invisable, $200,000 wall around it >
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness, (continued)
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Lynn Nadeau, May 13 1998
- RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Robin D. Ellison, May 14 1998
- RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Rob Sandelin, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Robin D. Ellison, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Roman Bitner, May 14 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.