Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Willits (dwn2erth![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 10:28:36 -0500 |
in response to the point you were actually making Robin, one of the problems is that the traditional institutions that provide community centeredness like churches have been failing us at local community levels although some still try and, they have not yet been replaced with an acceptable secular alternative. the inability to make old neighborhoods attractive or "nice" is the cause of suburban sprawl. jim willits http//www.bioactive.com http//willits [at] bioactive.com ---------- > From: Robin D. Ellison <Robin.D.Ellison [at] Dartmouth.EDU> > Subject: RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness > Date: Thursday, May 14, 1998 9:48 AM > > --- Deb Smyre wrote: > One question is can't the benefits of co-housing be duplicated within any single-family community via block-clubs, backyard barbeques, shared child-care, co-op food buying, etc. The questions seem to revolve around whether the old-fashioned approaches to achieving a sense of community aren't just as effective as co-housing, > --- end of quote --- > > --- Lynn Nadeau wrote: > The trick is to create opportunities to be together, around stuff that people have to > do anyway. > --- end of quote --- > > I think the "bumper sticker" answer here is that cars kill neighborliness. > > In my non co-housing experience [and I would be happy to share this] neighborliness is directly related to the amount of casual contact one has with the neighbors. That contact is directly related to how much people walk in the neighborhood. How much people walk in a neighborhood is directly related to the use of cars. > > Co housing encourages pedestrian traffic by excluding cars for the center of the community. This is not the only difference between co-housing and conventional neighborhoods, but it is the most clear one your fellow students can see, and the hardest to address in a conventional neighborhood. > > I think if one were to close a block to car traffic that very soon neighborliness would increase noticeably. If one were then to focus on block parties and pot luck dinners, what you would have would be very close to co-housing [maybe just one common house short :-) ]. > > > happy trails > Robin Ellison > Hartland VT. >
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness, (continued)
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Robin D. Ellison, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jim Willits, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Roman Bitner, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness dwn2erth, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Jennifer S. Stevens, May 14 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Matt Lawrence, May 15 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.