RE: Value of Work | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Eileen McCourt (Eileen.McCourt![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:47:01 -0600 (MDT) |
Sharon, I agree with your comments. From my perspective separating the food and cooking work from other types of work is reactionary and is based on a the perception of it as women's work. I think all work for the benefit of the community should be valued equally. If not enough people want to cook, I question the value of eating together. --eileen Eileen McCourt phone (408) 878-7326 eileen.mccourt [at] exodus.net cell (650) 766-0889 -----Original Message----- From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org] On Behalf Of Sharon Villines Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:46 PM To: Cohousing-L Subject: [C-L]_Value of Work I'm reading Graceful Simplicity: Toward a Philosophy and Politics of Simple Living by Jerome M. Segal. He talks about work in economist's terms as having "exchange value" or "use value". A diamond has a very high exchange value but less use value. Cooking has very high use value but less exchange value. No one ever pays as much to a good cook as for a diamond. And this is not just because it is a service with a disappearing product. Much of the use value of cooking is not recognized outside the home because it never enters the market place to be measured in value terms. It happens without being measured. It just is. Of course we know that is not true ultimately, but for many people it is true on a daily basis. Children just eat. Husbands often just eat. Guests just eat. The cook gets no recognition except for a special occasion. The daily breakfast gets nothing. I think perhaps there is something in requiring cooking that continues this pattern. Other forms of work are seen as having both use and exchange value. Everyone enjoys the garden and gardeners are praised for gardening. We expect that someone will enjoy doing the gardening. Someone will enjoy doing the accounting, if only because some see it has having status of some sort. We have a young man who is working very hard on our budgeting process because it is good training for him and feather in his cap professionally. Why don't we expect this of cooking? Segal would say "Because we are still seeing it as work with no grace." Gardening has a graceful element to it (though we know it is back breaking also). Columns of figures all sorted out are graceful. It pleases many of us to do sums and equations. We don't approach cooking the same way we do other activities. That I think is the point I'm wondering about. Sharon -- In Washington DC where all roads lead to Casa Blanca _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Value of Work, (continued)
- Re: Value of Work Sharon Villines, April 18 2001
-
Re: Value of Work Kay Argyle, April 19 2001
-
RE: Value of Work Eileen McCourt, April 19 2001
- Re: Value of Work Kay Argyle, April 20 2001
-
RE: Value of Work Eileen McCourt, April 19 2001
- RE: Value of Work Eileen McCourt, April 18 2001
-
Re: The joys of cooking Hans Tilstra, April 18 2001
- Re: The joys of cooking Sharon Villines, April 18 2001
- Re:The joys of cooking meals Peter Scott, April 19 2001
- Re: RE: [C-L]_Value of Work Robert P. Arjet, April 18 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.