Re: RE: [C-L]_site location/size and children (was Households to Adults Ratios) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Berrins (Berrins![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 00:04:01 -0600 (MDT) |
In a message dated 4/28/01 7:22:40 PM, emccourt [at] mindspring.com writes: << So, all this leads me to say that families tend to come later in the project cycle, after the location is selected, and closer to construction, when the risk is lower. --eileen >> That wasn't the case with Pathways. There were several families among the early core members. And while most, if not all, of the families were local, almost all the early members were local. The mix of households with and without children continued as more and more households joined. For us, the early members tended to be local, while more out-of-towners came later (many of whom heard about us through our web site). Roger Berman Pathways Northampton, MA _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: RE: [C-L]_site location/size and children (was Households to Adults Ratios) Berrins, April 28 2001
-
Re: RE: [C-L]_site location/size and children (was Households to Adults Ratios) Racheli&John, April 29 2001
- Re: site location/size and children (was Households to Adults Ratios) Kay Argyle, April 30 2001
-
Re: RE: [C-L]_site location/size and children (was Households to Adults Ratios) Racheli&John, April 29 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.