RE: Agenda Planning | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rowenahc (rowenahc![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 08:05:02 -0600 (MDT) |
We have a facilitator's group that meets to plan the meetings and calls those who submitted items, to discuss their time needs, etc. Since we have instituted a "decision board" and delegated less significant decision-making to smaller groups we rarely have a major conflict. Most significant matters are discussed in smaller groups or committees, the proposals posted and comments solicited, revisions made, discussed on our intranet, and so on before they come to a large meeting. Committees also post minutes and proposals to allow for general comment. By the time something comes to a general meeting, those with serious disagreements have generally been heard and their issues dealt with either by modifications to the proposals or by the objecting individual agreeing to stand aside - a VERY important part of the consensus process by the way and one that tends to be overlooked. This means that we can usually get through most business quite rapidly leaving time for issues that need indepth discussion - usually matters that are just beginning to take shape, "hopes and concerns" sessions, and such like. Although we use the classic "card" system for both discussion purposes and decision-making, the days when the cards showing "serious disagreement" were often displayed have gone and I don't remember when anything was last red-carded. (By the way, I think cards are preferable to fingers and thumbs. We have a box of card sets which are held together by a large ring. On each side of the colored card are instructions on its use in either discussion or decision-making so that there is no confusion. We also have the instructions on a large poster which gets dragged out for the annual meeting and other potentially fraught meetings.) Rowena Cambridge Cohousing -----Original Message----- From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Becky Schaller Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 2:24 PM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: [C-L]_Agenda Planning I'm wondering how other communities decide what items get on the agenda for each meeting. Here at Sonora Cohousing, people submit items and the approximate times needed to the facilitator. Hopefully, when it's all added up, there is more time than is requested. That has seldom been the case so often times items get delayed to the next meeting. And perhaps to the next meeting. I'm wondering how other communities decide what gets on the agenda and what gets put off. I understand there is a group in Rob's community which does this along with supporting the groups meeting in other ways. I rather like this idea and I'm wondering about other ways of deciding. Would you be willing to say how your community makes these decisions. Who decides what gets on the agenda? Becky Schaller Sonora Cohousing Tucson,Arizona Where the pool opened yesterday _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Agenda Planning Becky Schaller, May 26 2001
- RE: Agenda Planning Rowenahc, May 27 2001
- RE: Agenda Planning Eileen McCourt, May 27 2001
- Re: Agenda Planning Elizabeth Stevenson, May 26 2001
- Re: Agenda Planning Eris Weaver, May 27 2001
- Re: Agenda Planning Berrins, May 28 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.