RE: Agenda Planning | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Eileen McCourt (emccourt![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 17:09:01 -0600 (MDT) |
We have a steering committee. The committee's main responsibility is to set the agenda for each meeting. The steering committee maintains a "parking lot" document, with timelines, for open issues. Stuff gets onto the parking lot one of two ways. Either an issue comes up during a meeting that needs to be resolved before a proposal can be agreed to (referred to committee for more information), or, an issue is presented during the "new business" portion of each meeting's agenda. The intention is to identify new business, determine the scope of the issue, whether to refer it to a committee, etc., and get it onto the parking lot for a future meeting. The champion of the issue has to bring it through the new business and and/or committee process. Proposals do not ordinarily come from an individual, but usually are sponsored by a committee with a recommendation. Complex topics/proposals are usually presented in email before the meeting. We loosely use the four categories important/not urgent, important/urgent, not important/urgent, and not important/not urgent methodology for prioritizing the parking lot. Some things do not make it to the agenda, and either become non-issues or are resolved some other way by the time they surface in the priority list or there is finally enough time to deal with them. These are the things that fall into the not important/not urgent category. This filter, though subjective, helps to focus on the important/urgent stuff and bring as much stuff as possible forward to be dealt with as important/not urgent. We try to stay out of the two not important zones. Of course if something really important is being overlooked, it will resurface or be championed by someone to get the proper attention. --eileen Eileen McCourt Oak Creek Commons Cohousing in Paso Robles, CA emccourt [at] mindspring.com http://oakcreekcommons.org -----Original Message----- From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Becky Schaller Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: [C-L]_Agenda Planning I'm wondering how other communities decide what items get on the agenda for each meeting. Here at Sonora Cohousing, people submit items and the approximate times needed to the facilitator. Hopefully, when it's all added up, there is more time than is requested. That has seldom been the case so often times items get delayed to the next meeting. And perhaps to the next meeting. I'm wondering how other communities decide what gets on the agenda and what gets put off. I understand there is a group in Rob's community which does this along with supporting the groups meeting in other ways. I rather like this idea and I'm wondering about other ways of deciding. Would you be willing to say how your community makes these decisions. Who decides what gets on the agenda? Becky Schaller Sonora Cohousing Tucson,Arizona Where the pool opened yesterday _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Agenda Planning Becky Schaller, May 26 2001
- RE: Agenda Planning Rowenahc, May 27 2001
- RE: Agenda Planning Eileen McCourt, May 27 2001
- Re: Agenda Planning Elizabeth Stevenson, May 26 2001
- Re: Agenda Planning Eris Weaver, May 27 2001
- Re: Agenda Planning Berrins, May 28 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.