RE: Giving or Taking | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Alison Truesdale (alisont![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:32:01 -0600 (MDT) |
I hope I can offer a simple alternative to the community-payment-for-childcare issue. Here at Two Echo Cohousing, we have almost always had volunteers among the members who do childcare during meetings. Our meeting schedule is set up every quarter and the volunteers are assigned to particular dates (along with the facilitator, recorder and snack provider) after they have notified the scheduler of any dates when they are not available. If something comes up and a person can't perform their job, or if the agenda demands that someone signed up for childcare attend the meeting, they are responsible for finding a replacement. Only one member of a partnered household will be asked to do childcare on any particular day so that the other can attend the meeting. We have two single parents (I am one of them). I like to attend meetings, the other doesn't seem to care to attend much. She does more childcare than I do, but I am asked to do it once or twice a year, which is certainly not asking much. I am glad to do it and trust the group to manage without me! :-) The benefits are obvious. The children are regularly looked after by non-parents and everyone gets to know each other better. There is no expense. Currently, we are dividing the children into two groups that are looked after by two teams of childcare providers (we have 22 childcare-aged children!). This brings children together on a regular basis that would not ordinarily play with each other. We are able to keep potentially disruptive pairs apart this way, too. Parents have donated toys and project materials for the childcare people to work with (we don't have a common house yet). Childcare is hosted by one of the providers so that they can monitor happenings in their house. Although this means that childcare providers do not attend the meeting, no one has said that they feel excluded from general meeting business because of it. During the meeting, a partner will speak for the one doing childcare if it's important enough. The only glitch is that we strive for 100% attendance when we have "process" meetings, when we devote one or two meetings exclusively to process issues. Then we need to hire out childcare. The liability issue is an interesting one that I had not thought of. I look forward to people's responses on that one. Alison Truesdale Two Echo, Brunswick, Maine _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Taxes and the Common Good, (continued)
- Re: Taxes and the Common Good Molly Williams, October 2 2001
- Re: Giving or Taking Diane R. Margolis, October 2 2001
- Re: Giving or Taking Rosa Leah, October 2 2001
- Re: Giving or Taking Molly Williams, October 2 2001
- RE: Giving or Taking Alison Truesdale, October 2 2001
-
Re: Giving or Taking Sharon Villines, October 2 2001
- Re: Giving or Taking-childcare Elizabeth Stevenson, October 2 2001
- Re: Giving or Taking-childcare Ann Zabaldo, October 2 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.