Sociocracy Email List | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:53:04 -0700 (MST) |
I've started reading Endenburg's work on Sociocracy and am fascinated by it. When I joined cohousing I was rather dumbfounded by the process for running meetings. While I agreed with consensus wholeheartedly, I couldn't figure out why parliamentary procedure had been thrown out. The explanation is that it is based on majority rule is not sufficient since the first level of decision making and the one that is preferred is "hearing no objections the measure passes." It's too complicated is not sufficient because there are simplified forms like the one used by the American Psychological Association. I tried to find process people who would work with me on adapting parliamentary procedure to a more process friendly format that required consensus and then tried to get parliamentary experts to work with me. No one was interested. "Never shall the twain meet." Discovering Sociocracy feels like salvation. In it I found explanations for all the reasons I was feeling like the consensus process was feeling autocratic instead of super-democratic as it should be. I went to YahooGroups to start a Sociocracy list --perhaps one for Sociocracy in Cohousing, and found a list had been started in 1998. It had 3 members, two of whom turned out to be John A Buchan who is the most active advocate in the USA. The other member is in Australia. Then there is me. I invite everyone who is interested in discussing Sociocracy to join this list. Since cohousing groups are already functioning on consensus, they are perfect for the model of governance. Consensus is a threshold for decision-making but it needs a governance structure and shared expectations on the part of the participants to work effectively. But to make the theory useful to those who do not care for sorting out abstractions, the language needs some work. Why base your theory on circles and present it in hierarchical terms in triangles, for example? Not a theory problem just an old set of examples. How do we make a better model that is easy to understand and apply? Using your primary account , send any message to this address to subscribe: Subscribe: sociocracy-subscribe [at] yahoogroups.com If you are asked to register, you do not have to give all the personal information. But having a registered account is helpful in changing your email address on all accounts and getting them all linked to a page called "my groups". Please join this list if you are interested in discussing Sociocracy. I think there will be more discussion here on Sociocracy and cohousing but some of the theory discussions will send people who just want a construction loan over the top. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Sociocracy Email List Sharon Villines, February 26 2002
-
Re: Sociocracy Email List Sheila Braun, February 26 2002
- Re: Sociocracy Email List Sharon Villines, February 26 2002
-
Re: Sociocracy Robyn Williams, February 26 2002
- Re: Sociocracy Sharon Villines, February 27 2002
-
Re: Sociocracy Email List Sheila Braun, February 26 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.