Service Dogs | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Alicianat (Alicianat![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:28:01 -0700 (MST) |
Banning service dogs, or in any way making them unwelcome by making it even an issue for discussion, is in my perspective, very unaccepting and inappropriate. So is suggesting that a disabled person depend on people who are neither trained to support that individual nor having a relationship of trust with the person needing assistance. The disabled person needs to determine what level of support vs. independence they want. The are entitled to whatever level of independence, autonomy and sense of freedom the service animal/dog provides them and offering to help so we don't get our carpets dirty is a bad reason for doing so. People who choose service animals as helpmates often do so because they do not want to have to lean on someone else's arm or constantly depend on another human being for meeting their needs. We need to keep that in consideration. We cannot an should not assume that a disabled person has a preference for depending on neighbors to "help". That may be a conscious choice which the community, including the disabled person makes, but legislating dogs out so the community can "help" to a disabled person who does not need or want that kind of help is inappropriate. In the ideal world, the community would welcome participating in supporting the specially challenged person. In truth, the very best way to do that may be creating an environment where the disabled person with service animal companion live independently with dignity and are fully and heartily welcomed in all areas of the common property. Common areas are as much an extension of home for the disabled as for everyone else, and making it unwelcoming to service animals is as significant as saying your husband or child is unwelcome and we really are saying "We don't want any disabled people with service animals here because it might inconenience us." That means finding ways to deal with animal dander or whatever other considerations as necessary. It is great to see a thoughtful discussion of issues relating to service animals. I hope this will start an honest look attitudes and values within the community regarding the disabled and promote better understanding. . There are enough places in the world where disabled people meed misunderstanding, discrimination and intolerance and they certainly do not need it in their home community. I would hope that every co housing community facing this consideration give some thought to understanding the the need of the disabled persons includes access with service animals in all common areas. Alicia Nation << I hope I'm not being politically incorrect. Another question I had about service dogs is whether they are as necessary in the commonhouse than they would be in a restaurant. My image of cohousing would mean that the community has an opportunity to provide the services that the animal would normally provide. I do think you are right that we should seriously consider air filters for the common house, but I still felt this question is worth asking. Jeanne Goodman Jamaica Plain Cohousing Bo >> _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: Service Dogs Racheli&John, September 1 2001
- Service Dogs Alicianat, March 27 2002
- Re: Service Dogs Catya Belfer-Shevett, March 27 2002
- Re: Service Dogs vs. allergies & asthma Kay Argyle, March 29 2002
-
Re: Service Dogs Jeanne Goodman, March 29 2002
- Re: Service Dogs Elizabeth Stevenson, March 29 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.