cars: convenience vs necessity | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: eugeniep (eugeniep![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:30:16 -0600 (MDT) |
Greetings.Although there is great appeal to leaving vehicles on the perimeter, it seems to me that these plans presume "ableness." My husband and I are both interested in cohousing, but are getting on in years. One of the aspects that we particularly like about our current condo is the attached garage that permits us to get into our house safely regardless of weather, especially ice. So I would caution against being too militant about requiring cars to be relegated to the outside, unless what you are looking for is a population that has no difficulties with mobility.
Eugenie Potter eugeniep [at] umich.edu _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
cars: convenience vs necessity eugeniep, April 16 2002
- Re: cars: convenience vs necessity/accessibility Elizabeth Stevenson, April 17 2002
-
Re: cars: convenience vs necessity Maggi Rohde, April 17 2002
- Re: cars: convenience vs necessity Martie Weatherly, April 17 2002
- Re: cars: convenience vs necessity Jim Snyder-Grant, April 17 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.