Re: Re: [C-L] Committee in Trouble | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (jnpalme![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:00:02 -0600 (MDT) |
>From Racheli I'm supposed to get ready to go on vacation, but I wanted to respond to the following: ... I am thinking of questions such as "what is the >need we are trying to address? What are ALL the different ways we can >think of to address that need? What are the questions we must ask our >selves to evaluate the appropriateness of any of these ideas (i.e. is it >safe, is it affordable, is it within our parameters of maintenance, does >it violate any previously-agreed upon policies)?" YES. This is what some of us attempted to do. The way I see it, there were people who were totally attached to the idea of a wall, and saw any attempt to open up the discussion as an expression of disrespect towards them. Have to go, R. ----------------------------------------------------------- jnpalme [at] attglobal.net (Racheli Gai) ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: Re: Consensus & Majority Voting\Committee in Trouble Becky Schaller, July 19 2002
-
Re: [C-L] Committee in Trouble Cheryl A. Charis-Graves, July 19 2002
- Re: Re: [C-L] Committee in Trouble Racheli Gai, July 19 2002
- Re: Re: [C-L] Committee in Trouble Grant McCormick, July 19 2002
- Re: Re: [C-L] Committee in Trouble Cheryl A. Charis-Graves, July 19 2002
- Re: Re: [C-L] Committee in Trouble Tree Bressen, July 22 2002
-
Re: [C-L] Committee in Trouble Cheryl A. Charis-Graves, July 19 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.