Re: Re: Consensus & Majority Voting\Committee in Trouble | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: pattymara (pattymara![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 14:13:01 -0600 (MDT) |
On Sat, 20 Jul 2002 07:10:21 -0600 Becky Schaller <bschaller [at] theriver.com> writes: > Part of the problem is that we're still learning how to resolve > disagreements in the committees >........I believe that in our community, we need to pay more attention to how the committees are working since that is where relationships are getting strained. >.....Does anyone recommend any resources which address questions about how committee members can best work together? > > Thanks, > Becky Schaller At Tierra Nueva, we have experienced some difficult interpersonal work on a few of our committees. It seems that the committees offer a good platform for interesting power & control struggles between strong personalities. The resources that we used were engaging a mediator, plus, using excruciatingly clear communication practices during the meetings. Normally we have not felt the need to write minutes for committee meetings, but when disagreements surfaced, it felt necessary and helpful to start recording minutes which everyone could reference when things got confusing and stickier. We used a trained mediator who lives here, chosen by the person who felt most threatened, or misunderstood. The meetings were rather gruelling, but ultimately helpful. (The person really wanted us all to pay for a mediator from outside the community, but we did not agree with her, so she chose someone from within the group, but not on the committee.) Positions became more clear, feelings were listened to, and acknowledged. Eventually we realized that it really wasn't about *isssues* we were trying to come to agreement on, it was really about the one person's unhappiness that we didn't agree with her or meet her needs (spoken and unspoken). (Yes, that's a judgement on my part.) Eventually, she resigned from the committee, we went forward with the work, and within 6 months she chose to leave the community. Part of our committee work involved compensating this person for a donation of an item she had made to the group, which we chose not to use. Relationship work is worthy work. One resource I would mightily recommend is Marshall Rosenberg's Non-Violent, Compassionate Communication book, workbooks and videos. We're in the process of forming a study group here to do more practice together. I know he has a website, and it has been mentioned on this list previously, but I can't seem to find the link in my files. He offers simple communication tools for discerning underlying needs and responding with big heart compassion (like a giraffe, which has the biggest heart of the land mammals). coheartedly, Patty Mara Tierra Nueva, Central CA Coast. mmmm ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Re: [C-L] Committee in Trouble, (continued)
- Re: Re: [C-L] Committee in Trouble Tree Bressen, July 22 2002
- Re: Re: Consensus & Majority Voting\Committee in Trouble Racheli Gai, July 19 2002
- Re: Re: Consensus & Majority Voting\Committee in Trouble Sharon Villines, July 19 2002
- Re: Re: Consensus & Majority Voting\Committee in Trouble Becky Schaller, July 20 2002
- Re: Re: Consensus & Majority Voting\Committee in Trouble pattymara, July 20 2002
- Marshall Rosenberg nonviolent communication link Jim Snyder-Grant, July 21 2002
- Re: Consensus & Majority Voting\Committee in Trouble Becky Schaller, July 21 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.