Re: guns-OT | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Matt Lawrence (matt![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:39:01 -0600 (MDT) |
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Elizabeth Stevenson wrote: > Plenty an honest, law-abiding citizen has come home to a child with his head > blown off. Gun owners can be many things, but stupidity is something that > gets people with guns in the house killed, whereas stupid people without > guns are less likely to die of gunshot wounds. Many people who get shot are > shot by a member of their own household. Children also die by various other means in insufficiently childproofed homes. Swimming pools are far more dangerous on a per-capita basis. Safety training is important when dealing with any dangerous tools, you should hear me lecture friends who come to work in my woodworking shop. > A student of mine was in a funk this week, because her 80yo mother-in-law > was just killed by someone who thought he saw a coyote on his property. It would be interesting to know the details. There aren't a lot of places where shooting a gun in a populated area is legal. > And of all the men who have killed their wives and children, I think pretty > much 100% of them did it with guns. That sounds like media hype to me. > I don't particularly want to get into a gun owning argument with anyone, > because it's not the sort of thing that people tend to change their minds > about. But if you think that somehow it makes no difference whether or not > you have a gun in your house as far as your long-term chances of survival, > you're dead wrong. You might want to check the various statistics. > As for rational and logical, I think that's in the eye of the beholder. I > don't think it's in any way rational to own a gun. If most of your friends > who own guns are more rational than the ones who don't, it says more about > your opinion than about your friends. I suppose there are a lot of hunters who would disagree and I know there are a lot of people who do target, skeet and trap shooting who would disagree. There are also a few Olympic events that use guns. > To be fair, I guess I have started an argument. I am happy to take this > off-list if others don't think it's appropriate here. I won't post again. I suspect you have started an argument. It sounds like to me that you are parrotting various media positions without having actually studied the statistics. -- Matt _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- RE: Re: (cohousing) communities' decision making premises, (continued)
- RE: Re: (cohousing) communities' decision making premises Catya Belfer-Shevett, October 26 2002
-
Re: Re: (cohousing) communities' decision making premises Racheli Gai, October 26 2002
-
Re: Re: (cohousing) communities' decision making premises Matt Lawrence, October 26 2002
- guns-OT Elizabeth Stevenson, October 26 2002
- Re: guns-OT Matt Lawrence, October 26 2002
- Re: guns-OT Elizabeth Stevenson, October 26 2002
- Re: guns-OT Racheli Gai, October 26 2002
- Re: guns-OT Howard Landman, October 28 2002
- Re: guns-OT Racheli Gai, October 28 2002
-
Re: Re: (cohousing) communities' decision making premises Matt Lawrence, October 26 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.