Re: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (argyle![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:50:02 -0700 (MST) |
> The objective of consensus is not compromise but resolution. > Sharon Putting it that way helps me grasp why I feel edgy about the way a current issue in our community looks like going. A couple of discussion groups using our facilities, with both resident and nonresident members, use incense. I've been doing a slow burn [pun intended] about this for at least a year now -- incense is every bit as harmful as the tobacco banned by our no-smoking policy, and we have at least a half dozen members with respiratory problems (including me). Every once in a while the back room was the only one available to hold a meeting in, and even after several days with the windows cracked open, enough VOCs lingered that I would cough for a couple of hours after the meeting. I'll speak up for other people, even if not for myself. The flashpoint came the night my room-mate came bouncing home, saying there was going to be a belly dance in the dojo. She pulled out pants, scarves, finger cymbals, and belts, and bundled me into a blanket to come watch, despite being sick. There was a stick of incense burning. After a minute or two in the room she was having trouble, and said that she wasn't going to be able to stay. Seeing her deflate, when she'd been so buzzing with anticipation, made me mad. The "compromise" some of the incense-users are willing to agree to is that (a) they won't burn it if they know someone with asthma is going to be present, and (b) they'll only burn it in a couple of rooms -- exactly what they were already doing. This is a compromise? I don't feel it offers me anything. An ad hoc committee of members on both sides of this issue is supposed to meet and draft a proposal. If the incense-users' offer is what passes, I'm going to have to stand aside, because I cannot and will not agree to something that compromises members' safety. And afterwards I go back to the slow burn, now without the consolation that they're acting out of ignorance -- they know what they're doing, and they insist on doing it anyway. Not exactly a resolution. Kay P.S. Sharon, can I quote your statement in the chapter on consensus in our handbook? argyle @ mines.utah.edu _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements Gail Holmes, February 11 2003
-
Re: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements Sharon Villines, February 11 2003
- Re: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements Kay Argyle, February 12 2003
- Re: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements racheli, February 12 2003
- Re: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements Elizabeth Stevenson, February 12 2003
- On incense and other toxic substances racheli, February 12 2003
- Re: On incense and other toxic substances Matt Lawrence, February 12 2003
-
Re: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements Sharon Villines, February 11 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.