Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 07:51:01 -0600 (MDT) |
On 4/08/2003 1:45 AM, "Elizabeth Stevenson" <tamgoddess [at] attbi.com> wrote: > But someone did ask me to clarify what I said, so I will add that I meant > that in many neighborhoods, there is a premium on a cohousing unit, meaning > that the same house would cost less in the surrounding neighborhood. The number I've heard, and I think the source mentioned was McCamment and Durrett, was that people will pay 10% more for a cohousing unit than for a comparable unit in the same area. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument against Development, (continued)
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument against Development Elizabeth Stevenson, April 7 2003
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument against Development Diana Carroll, April 7 2003
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment Elizabeth Stevenson, April 7 2003
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment Sharon Villines, April 8 2003
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment Elizabeth Stevenson, April 8 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.