Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 08:49:01 -0600 (MDT) |
Just read my post, and it's just a wee bit cranky! I violated my rule about not posting after 10pm again.... Liz > From: Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> > Reply-To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 09:50:07 -0400 > To: "cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> > Subject: Re: [C-L]_The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment > > > On 4/08/2003 1:45 AM, "Elizabeth Stevenson" <tamgoddess [at] attbi.com> wrote: > >> But someone did ask me to clarify what I said, so I will add that I meant >> that in many neighborhoods, there is a premium on a cohousing unit, meaning >> that the same house would cost less in the surrounding neighborhood. > > The number I've heard, and I think the source mentioned was McCamment and > Durrett, was that people will pay 10% more for a cohousing unit than for a > comparable unit in the same area. > > Sharon > -- > Sharon Villines > Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC > http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument against Development, (continued)
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument against Development Diana Carroll, April 7 2003
-
RE: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment Rob Sandelin, April 7 2003
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment Elizabeth Stevenson, April 7 2003
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment Sharon Villines, April 8 2003
- Re: The "Burden on Local Schools" Argument againstDevelopment Elizabeth Stevenson, April 8 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.