Re: Eliminate the 4 bedrooms
From: Robert (robertenocommons.org)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:17:52 -0800 (PST)
As those who would opt for the 4 BR would be less price sensitive than folks opting for the 1 BR, consider folding the entire cost of adding this configuration just to two 4-BR units.

We have had folks move off site because our larger House B, 1974 sq ft, was too small for newly-blended family.

However, where Eno Commons is suburban cohousing, I recommend checking with the more urban sites.

-Robert Heinich
Eno Commons Cohousing
Durham, NC
whose House A, 1483 sq ft, is just right for him and the four very fluffy cats


----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Clark" <TimClark [at] 2feetunder.com>
To: <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 11:15 AM
Subject: [C-L]_ Eliminate the 4 bedrooms


We have planned two 4 bedroom units into our 36 unit urban community.

In an effort to standardize and have as few designs as possible we are toying with the idea of dropping the 4 bedrooms. The only thing slightly different in our configuration is that we are planning to have 4 small offices in the common house.

The mix would be:
4 1BR
14 2BR
18 3 BR

Your thoughts Please

Tim


_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/




Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.