Re: Common House Tables | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (kay.argyle![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:13:22 -0800 (PST) |
> ... the best common house tables: > 1. Are not round. Round tables take up way too much space ... (etc.) For a while our dining room had two round tables, on loan. They seated eight (72"?). They were always the first to fill at meals and were much missed when their owner moved and took them with her. We have talked about replacing them, but we have enough perfectly functional rectangular tables - about once a year the common house committee has a conversation along the lines of, "That table is wobbling pretty badly. Could you take a look at it?" "Let me see ... I should be able to fix that." "Oh darn!" It's true that round tables don't seat as many as compactly as rectangular tables. For most events, that is a nonissue. We have several tables that spend most of their time leaning on the wall in the back hall and are only needed occasionally. (We could sorely use storage for tables and chairs - it's more than your life is worth to walk down the back hall in the dark.) A few times we tucked the round tables in the hall and borrowed extra rectangular tables (not to mention chairs and place settings) to shoehorn in an expected overflow crowd. What with student violin recitals, meet-the-candidate nights, seed swaps, craft sales, and two separate dance groups using the dining room, folding tables are an absolute necessity to us. Kay Wasatch Commons
- Re: common house tables, (continued)
- Re: common house tables Robyn Williams, December 11 2001
-
Common House Tables Joani Blank, February 11 2008
- Re: Common House Tables Tim Mensch, February 11 2008
- Re: Common House Tables Sharon Villines, February 11 2008
- Re: Common House Tables Kay Argyle, February 12 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.