Re: Losses | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sarah Florreich (sflorreich![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:01:51 -0700 (PDT) |
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Catya Belfer-Shevett <catya [at] homeport.org> wrote: > In terms of how the accounting works, we basically put it in a line item > as a project expense, along with all of the other project expenses. Our > fabulous finance person reads the list, so she can say exactly which, > but it might have gone in the marketing/membership line item? > > Honestly, rolled into the final project bucket? Even 6 digit money > doesn't break the bank. (Says me, anyway.) > Yes, our project is so large that even at $200K of sunk costs, it is not really noticeable to the bank (2% of our oveall budget), so in that way we were "lucky". From what I've learned, one could allocate it out to the lines it was spent on (legal, engineering, etc), or lump it all in one unrelated, generic category like we did, as long as it doesn't cause that line item in the budget to look greatly out of line to what a bank would normally expect for that line item. No one who has ever bought in after we did all that prior work has objected to having to pay for this, as we make it clear it's the price to get where we are. Often one has to try a few times to get the right land/buildings at the right time, when the stars are aligned and all that. :-) - Sarah
-
Losses Nikki Sachs, April 20 2008
-
Re: Losses Raines Cohen, April 21 2008
-
Re: Losses Catya Belfer-Shevett, April 21 2008
- Re: Losses Sarah Florreich, April 21 2008
- Re: Losses Elizabeth Magill, April 22 2008
- Re: Losses Craig Ragland, April 22 2008
-
Re: Losses Catya Belfer-Shevett, April 21 2008
- Re: Losses Jenny Guy, April 22 2008
-
Re: Losses Raines Cohen, April 21 2008
- Re: losses Joelyn Malone, April 22 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.