Elevators and exclusions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 09:00:23 -0700 (PDT) |
By building a cohousing community you are excluding most people right from the start who would never choose to live in such close association with their neighbors. You are excluding those who do not like meetings, you are excluding those who want privacy. The list of exclusions involved in creating a community from scratch is huge and probably the biggest in many cohousing endeavors is economic. Lots of people simply can not afford to buy a house. So to worry about being exclusionary is not worth the energy. Instead, you might think about what goes on upstairs which is being denied people if you choose not to host the expense of an elevator. If dinner and large meeting space is on the accessible floor, then what exactly would the upper floors be used for? And then take into account if those activities could be moved to the lower floor if needed to accommodate someone. If upstairs is secondary meeting rooms, library, etc then you might not want to host the expense of an elevator and rather, if the need arises, simply move those activities down to the main floor. A large dining room can host many activities besides dinner. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood Cohousing
-
Required handicap access to 2nd floor/elevator maryvk, May 8 2008
-
Re: Required handicap access to 2nd floor/elevator Robert Heinich, May 8 2008
- Elevators and exclusions Rob Sandelin, May 8 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Lise Beals, May 8 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Sharon Villines, May 8 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Ann Zabaldo, May 9 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Rob Sandelin, May 9 2008
-
Re: Required handicap access to 2nd floor/elevator Robert Heinich, May 8 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.