Re: Elevators and exclusions
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 09:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
On May 8, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Rob Sandelin wrote:

 And then take into account if those activities
could be moved to the lower floor if needed to accommodate someone. If upstairs is secondary meeting rooms, library, etc then you might not want to host the expense of an elevator and rather, if the need arises, simply move
those activities down to the main floor.

But it must be very difficult for those who always have to have meetings moved. They often feel like a burden anyway so why compound this by planning your community around doing it?

It must also be very strange to never know what the upstairs or downstairs looks like in your own community.

One option is to build a ramp to go down and a ramp to go up. Carrying laundry down or groceries in would be much easier than stairs anyway.

I am perfectly able bodied but have a trick knee (universal in my family) so depending on how much walking and stairs I've done that day, it just doesn't do more. I also have mild allergies and they stuff up my ears making my balance undependable in the spring and fall. So the elevator is safer for me.

It's not a small consideration for a community to be accessible to everyone. It's a big exclusion, not just one of preference like not wanting to go to meetings or live close to other people. And inaccessibility affects everyone and their guests at some time or the other.

Sharon
----
Sharon Villines
Takoma Village Cohousing,Washington DC
http://www.takomavillage.org




Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.