Re: required handicap access | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lynn Nadeau (welcome![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 09:41:53 -0700 (PDT) |
Your common house is governed by some building code classification.
You must know that, and the attached requirements, to design it so it
will be permittable. Ours was, I believe, N1, or whatever a church
parish hall would be. Your classification affects not only ADA
requirements, but fire exits, floor construction, number of
lavatories, parking, and more. If you don't know what parts of the UBC
(uniform building code) apply, find out right away.
Beyond the legal, I second the ethical and practical comments others have made. Our Common House is ADA compliant, but our individual homes are mostly not even "visitable". I heartily recommend that communities planning housing require at least visitability (so a person with, say, a wheelchair, can access the main floor and bathroom of a dwelling). (Many ADA features are also useful for everyone, for example wingy faucet handles and lever door knobs. )
When we were looking at a 2-story common house, we researched elevators and found that a "wheelchair lift" was more economical. It is, in effect, a small elevator, in a 5x5 shaft. One also needs to plan a certain amount of floor space for entering and exiting the lift.
Lynn Nadeau RoseWind Cohousing, Port Townsend where we may have a resale coming up www.rosewind.org
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.