Re: qualifying a block as legitimate | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:20:01 -0700 (PDT) |
On Apr 7, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Muriel Kranowski wrote:
For our part, we have a block override in our bylaws but to date have neverhad a sustained block so we don't know how it would work out. We also haven't defined exactly "consensus" means to us,
We have a majority vote in our bylaws to be used if consensus cannot be reached, but no process for determining when it can be invoked. We haven't gotten close to using it, although one or two residents would like to use it.
We also don't have definition of consensus written down. In effect, we it means no remaining objections.
Sharon ---- Sharon Villines in Washington DC Where all roads lead to Casablanca
- Using community values as an arbitration point in legitimizing a block, (continued)
- Using community values as an arbitration point in legitimizing a block Rob Sandelin, April 7 2009
- Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Sharon Villines, April 7 2009
-
Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Muriel Kranowski, April 7 2009
- Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Racheli Gai, April 7 2009
- Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Sharon Villines, April 7 2009
- Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Jessie Kome, April 8 2009
- Re: qualifying a block as legitimate David Heimann, April 7 2009
- Re: Qualifying a block as legitimate R.N. Johnson, April 10 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.