Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Richart Keller (richart.keller![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:45:09 -0700 (PDT) |
Its important to keep in mind the reason for the work requirement...i.e. that working together on community (and individual) projects is central to building the social capital which is essential for successful cohousing communities. As is accomodating the needs of residents who are truly unable to participate. Richart Keller, AICP 120 Pulpit Hill Road #25 Amherst, MA 01002 413-835-0011 401 486-2677 (cell) -----Original Message----- From: Sharon Villines [mailto:sharon [at] sharonvillines.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:32 PM To: Cohousing-L Subject: Re: [C-L]_ work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? On 19 Apr 2011, at 1:19 PM, R Philip Dowds wrote: > Anticipating contingencies is a critical component > of all planning and forecasting efforts. Of necessity, contingencies > are hypothetical; were they not, they'd be actualities. True. However, if you look at the hypotheticals that argue against mandatory workshare - play or pay - they are always of the poor lowly paid, overworked single parent who can't pay and will be further discriminated against by the rich, well-paid handsome couple who can just buy themselves out of more work and go on vacation. While it is still hard, evidenced by the fact that we are still having this discussion, to write the policy at all, one can write for the group as it exists now and change it when the situation above arises. That avoids the hypotheticals and gives you objections you can resolve, or have a good chance of resolving, one way or another. In our case, for such a system to be mandatory, we would have to exempt at least two people. In these two instances, both work, one far more than could be expected. They are just opposed for emotional reasons - "homes shouldn't work on a play or pay basis." Exceptions can also be fair resolutions if everyone agrees to them. We recently, after 10 years, passed a pet policy banning additional outdoor cats by exempting the ones we had already. It was the only way and everyone was reasonably comfortable with that solution. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice?, (continued)
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Beverly Jones Redekop, April 17 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Sharon Villines, April 19 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? R Philip Dowds, April 19 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Sharon Villines, April 19 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Richart Keller, April 20 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Sharon Villines, April 20 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Kay Argyle, April 25 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Sharon Villines, April 25 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Elizabeth Magill, April 16 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.