Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:09:28 -0700 (PDT) |
On 20 Apr 2011, at 11:45 AM, Richart Keller wrote: > Its important to keep in mind the reason for the work requirement...i.e. > that working together on community (and individual) projects is central to > building the social capital which is essential for successful cohousing > communities. But is it? Like other theories of cohousing this one may be languishing as well. Meals are a major social time and do not satisfy any work requirement, except fixing lunch on workdays. We have one person who has paid rather than work for years — it didn't diminish his participation in the community and we need the money as much as the ork. Some people who do work, participate barely at all — their jobs are solo jobs. It hasn't worked out that entering the community through the CH, for example, has affected the community one way or the other. Most of our residents do not, and some even park on the other side of the property. Some then pick up mail later in the evening which actually provides an opportunity for more casual conversation. More and more work at home so they are in the CH at varying times during the day. The laundry room provides almost no social interaction in the CH because some people use the side door and do not enter directly into the CH. Others put in the laundry and go back upstairs, returning only to switch to the dryer or pick up their laundry. The only interaction is when actually in the room when someone else is putting in laundry. More new communities are hiring developers, and developers developing communities. Is there any evidence that these communities are less strong than self-developed communities? Does participating in the design process produce architecture that is any more unique than other new communities? A few years ago I visited a rental building a block away from us and had a very eery feeling about the place. Then I realized it looked just like ours except they had bamboo floors and a better layout. To keep building costs economical, there are only so many choices to be made. Aesthetic decisions we left to our developer as too polarizing for a group to make ourselves anyway. I think occasional large activities that involve everyone might be better community builders than routine tasks like cleaning the CH every two weeks or scrubbing toilets. Other jobs we do better ourselves like managing the finances and supervising hired workers. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines "Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere." Albert Einstein
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice?, (continued)
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Sharon Villines, April 19 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? R Philip Dowds, April 19 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Sharon Villines, April 19 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Richart Keller, April 20 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Sharon Villines, April 20 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Kay Argyle, April 25 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Sharon Villines, April 25 2011
- Re: work-or-pay system - legalities? general advice? Elizabeth Magill, April 16 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.