Re: Common House Use Proposal
From: Kay Argyle (Kay.Argyleutah.edu)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 12:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
To go back to the original question, which is to say, the proposal, I would
put #1 about nonresident owners as a subclause to #2, or following it.
Putting it first seems to give greater importance to nonresident owners than
to residents.

Personally, this proposal wouldn't greatly motivate me to work, because I
almost never schedule our common house. On the other hand, I like the fact
it links rights to responsibilities.

Kay
Wasatch Commons


Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.