Topic drift, subj lines and excess quoting | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 08:41:31 -0700 (PDT) |
May 10th as post "Common House Use Proposal" immediately evolved into a "meta" discussion on Rules and "law-free" with little reference to Common House Use which has upset some folks. Here's a list of the number of related messages under various subject lines: 27 Common House Use Proposal 10 Rules 9 Law free 4 CH use rules 2 CommonHouse use 2 Common House Use Guidelines This message is to try and set some guidelines for Cohousing-L subject lines. Note that I think that tho subject lines are the most important part of an email message, the nature of mailing lists and email are such that "Topic Drift" and subject lines that dont reflect the content of the message will be a continuing problem. In that respect it is like the problem of excessive quoting a bit. But maybe we can do better. Most people do not read all of their email and subject lines help prioritize what gets read. This makes having an informative relevant subject line important. So please give some thought to the subject line on messages you post. If you are initiating a post (not a reply) carefully assign the subject line. If you are replying to a message, consider whether the subject line is STILL informative and relevant. Especially in the case of mailing list messages the subject line serves two purposes, the second being to identify the thread - that is sequence of messages that are related and part of one discussion topic. Thus for mailing lists, ideally the subject line should not change too often. If the topic has drifted significantly from what the subject line indicates, consider using a different or modified subject line. If someone else has used a modified subject line of the drifted topic that is relevant to your post, consider using it. Consider using a subject line that has a "back reference" to the previous subject line in the form: New subject [was: Old subject. Also lately there has been significant amount of excessive quoting... Please try to limit the quotes to what is eeded to set the context for your post. See the discussion last March 14-16 "Trim Your Tails" in the archives http://lists.cohousing.org/archives/cohousing-l (Use the --> arrow in upper right to get back a page and search for "Trim" ) or my summary post back then: http://lists.cohousing.org/archives/cohousing-l/msg32704.html Note that I pondered how we could "apply positive or negative incentives" ** to improve the composition of list posts, but so far have not come up with anything. However, remember folks your words are what people judge you by here, the better your post (the better the subject line, the better the quoting style etc etc) the better peoples opinion of you wil be. ** from Eris Weaver's great (IMHO) post in the current "Rules" thread: http://lists.cohousing.org/archives/cohousing-l/msg32910.html Recently I came across "Seven Rules to Not Sucking at Email" http://markosullivan.ca/dont-suck-at-email/ It even has a cute cartoon. First rule: "1. Use the Subject Line" Fred, listserv manager, http://justcomm.org -- Fred H. Olson Minneapolis,MN 55411 USA (near north Mpls) Email: fholson at cohousing.org 612-588-9532 My Link Pg: http://fholson.cohousing.org My org: Communications for Justice -- Free, superior listserv's w/o ads
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.