| Re: Subject: Re: car sharing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Mabel Liang (mabel |
|
| Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:37:09 -0700 (PDT) | |
We have someone who is proposing to keep ownership of their (soon-to_be)
second car, but have the association pay via reimbursement for all the
expenses, including insurance, excise taxes. Individual users would pay
for gas. That's the gist of the details as I remember them right now.
I understand what you're saying about paying expenses. That was in the
plan I outlined to my agent. There was no profit. He still said it
needed a commercial policy.
Thanks! Still interested in hearing how your option 2 owner is dealing
with insurance.
-- Mabel :-)
Mabel Liang
mabel [at] twomeeps.com
Software Engineer turned Gardener
Cornerstone Village Cohousing
North Cambridge, MA
---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: RE: [C-L]_ Subject: Re: car sharing
From: "Lautner, Patricia" <Patricia.Lautner [at] umassmed.edu>
Date: Fri, March 16, 2012 11:28 am
To: "'mabel [at] twomeeps.com'" <mabel [at] twomeeps.com>
"'Cohousing-L'" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you talk to the agent they will tell you that you need a commercial
> policy. I just said to my agent that I have a close friend who is also
> insuring her car with your company. I'd like to add her name to my policy
> because I sometimes lend her the car. They thanked me, added her name,
> and increased the insurance slightly (not to the commercial level). Her
> husband also uses the car but we didn't bother with his name because at
> the time we expected that he would use the car less often.
>
> Regarding money changing hands: Each person is paying for usage, although
> it's true that it's all under my name. I pay the bills and send an
> invoice to my neighbor each month.
>
> If your HOA is planning to own the car and have people pay for usage
> through condo fees, I imagine you would need to have a commercial policy.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mabel Liang [mailto:mabel [at] twomeeps.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 10:33 AM
> To: Cohousing-L
> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Subject: Re: car sharing
>
>
> Hi Patti,
>
> I would certainly be interested in knowing about option 2. For that
> matter, I'd also be interested in what you told the agent about the
> details in option 1. When I discussed a cost-sharing arrangement with my
> insurance agent (also in MA) a few years ago, he said we would need a
> commercial policy. And if the financial arrangement wasn't disclosed and
> there was an accident with the non-owner driver, the details of the
> arrangement might come out under questioning and the non-commercial
> insurance might not cover it. The key seemed to be money changing hands,
> not whether it was for profit.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Mabel :-)
>
> Mabel Liang
> mabel [at] twomeeps.com
> Software Engineer turned Gardener
> Cornerstone village Cohousing
> North Cambridge, MA
>
>
>
-
Subject: Re: car sharing Jerry McIntire, March 16 2012
-
Re: Subject: Re: car sharing Lautner, Patricia, March 16 2012
- Message not available
- Re: Subject: Re: car sharing Mabel Liang, March 16 2012
- Re: Subject: Re: car sharing Lautner, Patricia, March 16 2012
- Message not available
- Re: Subject: Re: car sharing Mabel Liang, March 16 2012
- Message not available
-
Re: Subject: Re: car sharing Lautner, Patricia, March 16 2012
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.