Unit mix/size | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Thomas Lofft (tlofft![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:36:58 -0700 (PDT) |
Other factors that ultimately define your unit mix and unit size may be how the local zoning ordinance describes the key variables and how sensitive your market demographics may be to how you design to optimize the variable mix. E.g., Variables may include the total 'Unit density", e.g., how many units per acre, or minimum land area required per unit. Definition of a 'Unit', as a dwelling unit, rental unit, or an owner occupied unit, attached unit, detached unit, semi-detached unit, etc. Parking space requirements to be provided on a per-unit basis, or by any other ratio; Maximum land area coverage: Is there a maximum % of the land area that may be covered by the building footprint(s) or a restricted ratio of the gross building area that may be constructed vs. gross land area? Height limits; Open Space requirements; definition of 'Open Space' vs. 'Green Open Space', which may. e.g., not count parking areas as 'Open Space' The offsetting factors are that often designing to the definitions may make a project more affordable, or cost effective. Typically, every 1 or 2 bedroom unit may still need 2 parking spaces, while a six room unit, designed as three 2-room suites with shared kitchen-dining may provide a 'shared accommodation' for three adult singles, sell three times as much floor area, be much more affordable than three smaller one BR units, and still only require 2 parking spaces, effectively creating more project value on the same piece of land. An example was a project I completed for Habitat for Humanity in Fairfax County, VA. We demolished a single family detached on 1/2 acre. That was the maximum development permitted under prior use, with a 60 year old bungalow setting in the middle of the parcel, fronting on a divided 6 lane highway, which also carried bus service. Rezoning was accomplished (12 months) which permitted either semi-detached, attached (TH), or stacked Multi-Family style construction, with other differing zoning constraints. The key variable was that parking was required for 2 spaces per TH unit, but only 1.5 spaces per unit for MF style. Parking requirements were independent of the unit size, # of BR, sq. footage, etc. We could effectively manage only 7 TH with 14 parking spaces and still meet open space area requirements. We designed for 9 condominium style flats, 3 per floor, 3 BR per unit, with a smaller building footprint, 14 parking spaces, larger and more usable recreational open space, better highway setback, and still served the units with an exterior 'core' stairwell that met all life safety codes but did not require interior finishes, sprinklering or daily custodial attention. The ground floor units were all fully accessible. Budgetwise, the 9 units were completed for a lower cost than the estimate for the 7 TH. They each shelter a working family and created a community of families bonding together. Best regards, Tom Lofft Grace Kim wrote: From: Grace Kim <grace [at] schemataworkshop.com> Subject: [C-L]_ Unit mix/size To: "smilliec [at] comcast.net" smilliec [at] comcast.net Christine- What you are asking for is actually info you would gain from a market study. While I think it's most typical for two beds to be most versatile w/larger bedrooms being best for families (if they can afford), I think your local market will be biggest indicator of what will sell. For example, if you are in rural area with single family homes, a 1bedroom may not work. But in a more urban area 1-bedroom homes may be just fine as part of the mix. And if you know that a large part of the demographic you may potentially be attracting are single women, they might be interested in shared households (rooming house style), so it might make sense to provide a rooms above the common house. While this list is great for general advice, I'd say you need to recognize there are major regional differences in housing demand, home sizes, and prices. As an architect, I'd say designing in some future flexibility/adaptability for unit sizes/configurations will be your best bet for success. Good luck. grace h. kim schemata workshop
- Re: Unit mix/size, (continued)
- Re: Unit mix/size Ellen Keyne Seebacher, March 31 2012
-
Re: Unit mix/size Fred H Olson, March 26 2012
-
Re: Unit mix/size Mariana Almeida, March 26 2012
- Re: Unit mix/size Sharon Villines, March 26 2012
-
Re: Unit mix/size Mariana Almeida, March 26 2012
- Unit mix/size Thomas Lofft, March 26 2012
- Re: Unit mix/size R.N. Johnson, March 26 2012
-
Re: Unit mix/size Fred H Olson, April 7 2012
-
Re: Unit mix/size Sharon Villines, April 7 2012
- Re: Unit mix/size Kay Wilson Fisk, April 9 2012
-
Re: Unit mix/size Sharon Villines, April 7 2012
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.