Re: bylaws: active/inactive status | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David Heimann (heimann![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 06:44:50 -0800 (PST) |
Hello Nancy and others,We have a similar work requirement (attend General Meetings, be active on at least one committee, and do 4 hours of work per adult resident per month). In the beginning of our time we kept detailed records of the hours each person put in and exerted pressure -- social, financial, legal, or otherwise on those coming up short. However, a lot of resentment came up about the heaviness of the accounting process -- the phrase "cohousing police" was often used. Over the course of a number of General Meetings and community conversations, it became clear that we could have fairness/accountability or a flexible and light process, but not both. At this point the community decided to go with the light process -- if some people did much more work than others, they could either accept that without resentment or cut back their extra participation -- if that meant that some required work wasn't getting done we would either find someone else to step up to the plate or we would hire out the work (with everyone understanding the budgetary and condo fee implications of that). Since then this flexible arrangement has worked very well, with many members putting in extra work because they felt they could and wanted to or because they felt it necessary to get work done to their standards, without their resenting the situation because they could (and sometimes did) at any time unload some of their extra burden. Of course, the rest of us made sure that they know that we appreciated their extra level of involvement and we made sure to help them out when they had requests!
We also have periodic work dates through the year when a given committee, e.g., outdoor, indoor, Community Life, etc., had a set of periodic tasks that needed doing. The committee posted task lists, people either signed up to do them or paid a fee to bypass it, and if some tasks weren't taken the committee chair would urge us to sign up for them or would use the fee money or other budget money to hire out the work. In the beginning these hours did not count towards the 4 hours per month, but since we went on our light process, this became moot.
It works! Regards, David Heimann JP Cohousing Jamaica Plain (Boston), MA Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:04:38 -0800 From: Nancy Morehouse <nmorehouse [at] aol.com> To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Cc: "lienjud [at] aol.com" <lienjud [at] aol.com> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ bylaws: active/inactive status Message-ID: <940F3C91-4778-4D37-80CE-801A7D527426 [at] aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Wolf Creek Lodge, Grass Valley CA? We have a Participation Team which maintains a current list of jobs and members doing them. Annually all members are sent a participation agreement to sign. Participation Team does followup and suggests monthly cash contribution from those who cannot participate. Amount of monthly contribution is voluntary. But, as with any group, 20% of the people do 80% of work. Nancy Morehouse
- Re: bylaws: active/inactive status, (continued)
-
Re: bylaws: active/inactive status Bree Kalb, December 11 2023
-
Re: bylaws: active/inactive status vicky wason, December 11 2023
- Work Expectations [ was bylaws: active/inactive status Sharon Villines, December 12 2023
- Re: Work Expectations [ was bylaws: active/inactive status Cheryl Keil, December 20 2023
-
Re: bylaws: active/inactive status vicky wason, December 11 2023
-
Re: bylaws: active/inactive status Bree Kalb, December 11 2023
- Re: bylaws: active/inactive status David Heimann, December 14 2023
- Re: bylaws: active/inactive status Cheryl Keil, December 20 2023
- Re: bylaws: active/inactive status JoAnna Allen, December 22 2023
-
Re: bylaws: active/inactive status lienjud [at] aol.com, December 15 2023
- Re: bylaws: active/inactive status Philip Dowds, December 15 2023
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.