Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lisa Kuntz (lisa.kuntz![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:28:07 -0700 (PDT) |
Claire and Sharon, Thanks for your perspective and suggestions. Yes, I wish all of this could be examined through the lens of "organizational/systems theory." It's a jolt to suddenly be looking at so many interactions and documents through the lens of possible FHA violations that I think may be rather narrowly interpreted. The perspective has introduced an element of anxiety that didn't formerly exist in our community. Lisa On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 11:23 AM Claire Richards <clairerichardsrn [at] gmail.com> wrote: > I have not read the entire thread here, but we have a list of things for > potential members to do to help them understand what they would be getting > themselves into: attend a cohousing meeting, help with dinner prep and > attend a dinner, join a work party, and attend a cluster meeting. > It is really important people understand that we have a consensus process > and that there are certain limitations to remodeling, which can be a > deal breaker for some. > Ultimately whoever is selling their place gets to decide who they are > selling to and at what price. We may all have our own opinions on the > demographics (personally, I would like to see more children-- so much more > fun for the kids) that is never mentioned to potential buyers. The selling > team always chooses people in the community who may be able to share their > experiences in the community with them in a meaningful way to sit with them > at dinner (e.g., if the interested buyers have a child, then they will have > them talk with a family that has children so they can talk about the local > schools, or what it is like to parent in community). > So I am not on the sales team, but it would really do people an injustice > if they have no way of knowing what they are really getting themselves into > by purchasing a home. > > Warm regards, > Claire > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:30 AM Sharon Villines via Cohousing-L < > cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > > > > On Jun 12, 2025, at 8:19 PM, Lisa Kuntz via Cohousing-L < > > cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > > > > > I always try to find the humor in dynamics like this. Surely one ironic > > > aspect is that they have alienated a once hard-working committed, long > > time > > > member because of what seems to me to be a judgmental, moralistic and > > > fundamentalist mind-set towards residents who "transgress." > > > > > > It's just the stuff of cohousing and something I was mostly prepared > for. > > > We're a bunch of sometimes unskillful volunteers with varying degrees > of > > > social intelligence! > > > > Some one more familiar with organizational theory could probably pin this > > down more neatly but I’ve noticed the same thing as a stage of > development > > related to “doing things myself” much like 2-6-year olds wanting to prove > > they are grownup. And take revenge on those who formerly claimed to be > > grown up. > > > > It seems to occur when the organization has become stable and acheived a > > sold degree of success, the next generation of adults aged > 40-50-something > > will need to claim fame by correcting the organization. They will get > very > > self-righteious about something like a sign in the tot-lot that says USE > AT > > YOUR OWN RISK or signs in the kitchen that say KNIVES ARE SHARP. And they > > will find a lawyer who will confirm that people with these signs have > > avoided liability in cases claiming person injury. The Fair Housing Act > is > > used the same way. What it really does is prevent them from taking true > > responsibility for defining “fair” in the context of cohousing. > > > > But it is also true that some people are doing this because they believe > > that they are saving the organization from peril and doom and don’t > > understand why anyone might criticize their signs. The signs make > cohousing > > legal and raise it to the level of public recognition worthy of > courtrooms. > > > > So you need to find a way to affirm their best intentions. I’ve tried the > > “No one who doesn’t know knives are sharp will be reading the sign” > > argument but it doesn’t work. Signs are a form of magic. They are there > in > > case you might need them. They keep people safe. > > > > A phrase used on the first Trump White House by John Kelly for impossible > > presidential proposals, “Staff it out.” Things that were circulated to > > staff for comment where never seen again. You might try that before > > anything gets to the policy level. Send it to a team. > > > > Sharon > > —— > > Sharon Villines > > Riderwood Village, Silver Spring MD > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > >
- Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community, (continued)
- Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community Lisa Kuntz, June 13 2025
- Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community R Philip Dowds, June 14 2025
- Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community Sharon Villines, June 13 2025
- Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community Claire Richards, June 13 2025
- Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community Lisa Kuntz, June 13 2025
- Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community Elizabeth Magill, June 11 2025
- Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community Sharon Villines, June 12 2025
- Re: Cohousing vs "traditional" self-managed community Hannah Ferber, June 12 2025
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.