Re: EV charging infrastructure | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 09:39:10 -0700 (PDT) |
> On Jul 1, 2025, at 8:39 AM, R Philip Dowds via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] > cohousing.org> wrote: > > My general impression is that consumers are definitely in favor of combating > climate change by converting to alternative, non-fossil energy sources … > provided that it doesn’t cost anything. Cornerstone has yet to test itself > on this, so I don’t know where we stand. I think the major problem is that non-fossil energy is marketed as reducing carbon or stopping climate change. That is too abstract for most people to consider when they are paying the bills each month or deciding what their children really “need.” Even for people who are able to think in terms of future benefits, it is too absract. The projection of one degree in temperature or one ton of an invisible substance is not enough to trust. Will my sacrifice this month really mean anything? For many cohousers it is rewarding to be able to say they use non-fossil fuel energy, but the household has to reach some level of economic security or self-education to believe that their actions might change anything. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Riderwood Village, Silver Spring MD
- Re: EV charging infrastructure, (continued)
- Re: EV charging infrastructure Ruby Reay, June 30 2025
- Re: EV charging infrastructure Stuart Pettygrove, June 30 2025
-
Re: EV charging infrastructure Philip Semanchuk, June 30 2025
-
Re: EV charging infrastructure R Philip Dowds, July 1 2025
- Re: EV charging infrastructure Sharon Villines, July 2 2025
- Re: EV charging infrastructure Kathryn McCamant, July 2 2025
-
Re: EV charging infrastructure R Philip Dowds, July 1 2025
-
Re: EV charging infrastructure jpustell [at] verizon.net, July 15 2025
- Re: EV charging infrastructure Leila Tite, July 15 2025
- EV charging infrastructure Jack Wilbern, July 2 2025
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.