Re: Architectural Review | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholsoncohousing.org) | |
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:14:21 -0800 (PST) |
Tim Clark <gsadix [at] earthlink.net> / www.2FeetUnder.com is the author of the message below. It was posted by Fred the Cohousing-L list manager <fholson [at] cohousing.org> because the message included only HTML -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- This my response to Sharon's request for architectural review policies There is always something that is going to bother someone, it is an unending process. You can bet that once all the offending bits are cut off and there is a little rest someone will find something else that offends them and the whole process will start all over again till every thing is ?beige?. Rather than me deal with my attachments to likes and dislikes I want you to not present me with things I dislike. (I wont complain if I like it). I have seen more than one vibrant alive group become sterile over trying to address everyone?s like and dislikes. I think architectural review policies should only concern themselves with property values and safety, past that it is ?Viva la difference?. Tim www.2FeetUnder.com
- Re: Architectural Review, (continued)
-
Re: Architectural Review Amy Dwyer, January 28 2005
- RE: Architectural Review Rob Sandelin, January 30 2005
-
RE: Architectural Review Alexander Robin A, January 31 2005
- Introduction Jennifer Gryn, January 31 2005
- Re: Architectural Review Fred H Olson, January 28 2005
- Re: Re: Architectural Review Sharon Villines, January 28 2005
-
Re: Re: Architectural Review - Changing Tastes normangauss, January 28 2005
- RE: Re: Architectural Review - Changing Tastes mark nichols, January 28 2005
- RE: Re: Architectural Review - Changing Tastes Karen Cravens, January 28 2005
-
Re: Architectural Review Amy Dwyer, January 28 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.