Re: What’s so funny ‘bout peace love & understanding? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Carver (jcarverislandnet.com) | |
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:27:53 -0800 (PST) |
On 11/02/2016 10:38 AM, Igor Cerny... observed, if I may paraphrase,
that while postings to coho-L have a lot about the mechanics of creating
and maintaining cohousing, "what I don’t see as often are discussions
about such things as kindness or civility within communities."
In fact there often are discussions about dealing with difficult people, who may be unkind or uncivil, but I don't think that's quite what he's getting at.
Perhaps there's an underlying assumption that anyone wanting cohousing wants an atmosphere of kindness and civility so it's not worth discussing. Or is it that we don't know how to create it?
It's long been my view that we can engineer environments but we can't engineer people. To illustrate, we can design a common house that we perceive to be welcoming and that invites warm and friendly interactions, but we can't design how people will feel or interact within that space.
John Carver Pacific Gardens Cohousing, Nanaimo, BC http://pacificgardens.ca/ (a warm and friendly environment)
-
What’s so funny ‘bout peace love & understanding? iggypopsa1, February 11 2016
- Re: What’s so funny ‘bout peace love & understanding? John Carver, February 13 2016
-
Re: What’s so funny ‘bout peace love & understanding? castrohom [at] aol.com, February 15 2016
- Re: What’s so funny ‘bout peace love & understanding? R Philip Dowds, February 16 2016
- Re: What’s so funny ‘bout peace love & understanding? Sharon Villines, February 16 2016
- Re: What’s so funny ‘bout peace love & understanding? Sharon Villines, February 16 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.