Re: common house meals | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonvillines![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 09:52:01 -0600 (MDT) |
> Also, since many of the tasks in different areas can be done > with different people, it gives each one of us a chance to potentially > bond with some of our community members which we might > not have much of a relationship with otherwise. - Again, this last one > isn't meant to justify a mandatory arrangements, but to point out > that having people doing more than the one thing they like most > is a good thing. This is a good point. The question, however, is why aren't the other tasks mandatory? It seems that only cooking is mandatory in any of the communities. The job of the treasurer is also relentless. Landscaping is relentless. For us, cleaning the commonhouse is relentless. I'm assuming that several people would be cooking, not just one. Some would like to cook more often than once every 10 weeks, and others wouldn't. Some want to do the job of purchasing, negotiating with local farmers, etc. The answer of why cooking is mandatory seems still to be unanswered. If all work is truly valued equally, why is one form mandatory? Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- RE: common house meals, (continued)
- RE: common house meals Eileen McCourt, April 17 2001
-
Re: common house meals Elizabeth Stevenson, April 17 2001
- Common meals frequency and social fabric Rob Sandelin, April 18 2001
-
Re: common house meals Racheli&John, April 18 2001
- Re: common house meals Sharon Villines, April 18 2001
- Re: common house meals Elizabeth Stevenson, April 18 2001
- RE: common house meals George Marx, April 18 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.