Re: common house meals | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli&John (jnpalme![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 09:19:01 -0600 (MDT) |
** Reply to note from "Elizabeth Stevenson" <tamgoddess [at] home.com> Tue, 17 Apr 2001 20:30:06 -0700 >From Racheli I agree with Liz: One of the elements of the common meals efforts is that it's an *extensive and continuous* effort - much more so than other types of community work. In fact, it's such a large effort, that unless it was very central to the community experience it might not be worth it... I was pondering some more the question why *I* might be resentful if other people got to eat on a regular basis without doing the work. The reason has to do with the following: I have been the cook in my household for many many years. Even though, on the everage, I like to cook more than most - when it's something of an unrelenting nature (people always want to be fed!) it wears one out. At this point, I'm ready to cook for people (other than my own family) if they cook for me. This isn't a statement of principle, it's the reality of someone who has cooked for over a quarter of a century without ever getting a sabbatical! :) (I'm including in the term "cook" the related activities of shopping for groceries, planning meals, and doing some of the cleaning - I think that often the mere chopping of vegetables is the easier part of the process). A more abstract point, and not a central one to this discussion, but which still has some validity: IMO it's important for people to do various things (even though in general I don't think we should coerce them to branch out...), and not fall into the trap of over-specializing. People who think they can't cook, might be surprised to find out that it can be fun, people who never thought they could relate to growing plants might discover otherwise, and so on. (This is especially so because doing work with others is often more fun than doing it alone). Also, since many of the tasks in different areas can be done with different people, it gives each one of us a chance to potentially bond with some of our community members which we might not have much of a relationship with otherwise. - Again, this last one isn't meant to justify a mandatory arrangements, but to point out that having people doing more than the one thing they like most is a good thing. Hope I'm making sense :) R. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: common house meals, (continued)
- Re: common house meals Racheli&John, April 17 2001
- RE: common house meals Eileen McCourt, April 17 2001
-
Re: common house meals Elizabeth Stevenson, April 17 2001
- Common meals frequency and social fabric Rob Sandelin, April 18 2001
- Re: common house meals Racheli&John, April 18 2001
- Re: common house meals Sharon Villines, April 18 2001
- Re: common house meals Elizabeth Stevenson, April 18 2001
- RE: common house meals George Marx, April 18 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.