Re: Breeching interpersonal Boundaries | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Howard Landman (howard![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:51:01 -0600 (MDT) |
Rob Sandelin wrote: > The privacy aspect of cohousing, in my opinion, attracts people who really > don't want to do relationship work, even when relationships are pretty > damaged. So this is an example where a personal boundary is unhealthy for > the community. This statement might make sense if one takes communes as normative. But compared to society-as-a-whole, it seems nonsensical to me. We give up a lot of privacy and autonomy to live in cohousing compared to living in the suburbs. We spend lots of time talking about visions for community and coping with the positive and negative feelings of others. It is much, much more intensely interpersonal than most of the outside world. Whether we "want" this or not, it comes with the territory, and we learn how to cope. People who value privacy and anonymity highly are probably not ideal candidates for cohousing. Howard A. Landman River Rock Cohousing "It isn't the heat, it's the humanity." - anon. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: What's wrong with communes? Racheli&John, May 10 2001
-
Re: What's wrong with communes vs. families Hans Tilstra, May 10 2001
-
Breeching interpersonal Boundaries Rob Sandelin, May 11 2001
- Re: Breeching interpersonal Boundaries Howard Landman, May 11 2001
- Privacy vs Anonymity Sharon Villines, May 11 2001
- Re: Breaching interpersonal boundaries Hans Tilstra, May 12 2001
-
Breeching interpersonal Boundaries Rob Sandelin, May 11 2001
-
Re: What's wrong with communes vs. families Hans Tilstra, May 10 2001
- Re: What's wrong with communes? Sharon Villines, May 11 2001
- Re: What's wrong with communes? Elizabeth Stevenson, May 10 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.