Re: Consensus and ideology | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 10:09:01 -0700 (MST) |
> What happened was, that some people promoted a redwood > structure, since it was the cheapest and offered (in the eyes > of some) the most "play-value" . > Other people (myself included) opposed using redwood, for > environmental reasons. We got attacked because we were > seen as pushing our own "ideology" on the community. Ah, the redwood controversy. Close to the paper or cloth diapers controversy. I haven't been following the redwood controversies so I have no idea what the "black and white" of the issue is. One option is to buy a used play structure as a temporary solution until the community values can be sorted out. Is sustainability part of your mission statement or other expressed values? Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Consensus and ideology, (continued)
- Re: Consensus and ideology Diane Simpson, December 22 2001
-
Defining for the good of the community Rob Sandelin, December 24 2001
- Re: Defining for the good of the community Sharon Villines, December 25 2001
-
Re: Consensus and ideology Racheli&John, December 22 2001
- Re: Consensus and ideology Sharon Villines, December 22 2001
- Re: Consensus and ideology Robyn Williams, December 23 2001
- RE: Consensus and ideology Rob Sandelin, December 24 2001
- Definitions of Cohousing Sharon Villines, December 25 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.