Re: Defining for the good of the community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 07:20:01 -0700 (MST) |
> This kind of process does something important. It sets the community > awareness in motion on two levels, that personal values can be stated and > people can object on values without stopping everyone and also it brings the > issue into the discussion in the future. .... And so, even though an > environmental choice was not supported once, the act of bringing it into the > groups awareness changes how things might be done in the future. Thanks, Rob, for saying this so well. Some find groups frustrating because they keep changing, others frustrated when they try not to change -- to lock in decisions and pin down positions. The nature of growth is change. If I can focus myself on the changes toward deeper understanding of values and how they are expressed, it is less frustrating. Remembering that I have already changed the group by emphasizing another point of concern makes it a lot easier to sleep at night. Sharon -- In Washington DC where all roads lead to Casablanca _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Consensus and ideology Becky Schaller, December 22 2001
- Re: Consensus and ideology Sharon Villines, December 22 2001
- Re: Consensus and ideology Diane Simpson, December 22 2001
-
Defining for the good of the community Rob Sandelin, December 24 2001
- Re: Defining for the good of the community Sharon Villines, December 25 2001
-
Re: Consensus and ideology Racheli&John, December 22 2001
-
Re: Consensus and ideology Sharon Villines, December 22 2001
- Re: Consensus and ideology Robyn Williams, December 23 2001
- RE: Consensus and ideology Rob Sandelin, December 24 2001
-
Re: Consensus and ideology Sharon Villines, December 22 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.