Re: Meeting Tools | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 07:41:01 -0700 (MST) |
On 12/27/2002 9:12 AM, "S. Kashdan" <skashdan [at] scn.org> wrote: > 3. What color card best suits the kind of comment or question I want to > voice; I find the categorization of what I want to say to be very burdensome. In CT Butler's consensus process, for example, first you have to get in line (we use a queue), then remember what you wanted to say until it is your turn, then be told, "We're just taking questions now, this sounds like a concern" is maddening. Even worse is "That sounds like a solution -- we are still hearing concerns." I understand the intention behind letting everyone speak, or letting everyone speak once before one can speak twice, but just have people speaking when someone else could answer their question immediately seems pointless. Unless you're doing a round to get a sense of the room, a queue can be the worst way to "discuss." Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Meeting Tools, (continued)
-
Re: Meeting Tools Kay Argyle, December 24 2002
- Re: Meeting Tools Tree Bressen, December 26 2002
- Re: Meeting Tools Sharon Villines, December 27 2002
- Re: Meeting Tools S. Kashdan, December 27 2002
- Re: Meeting Tools Sharon Villines, December 27 2002
- RE: Meeting Tools Maggie, December 27 2002
-
Re: Meeting Tools Kay Argyle, December 24 2002
- The history of colored cards Rob Sandelin, December 27 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.