Individual versus group needs and wants | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Gary Kent (garykent![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:08:01 -0700 (MST) |
I love the theory and philosophy of consensus. Everyone is heard, all opinions are respected etc., etc., However........ How about a group member who sounds like a broken record - same thing over and over again. Things are complicated by the member not having a terrific memory for facts, resorting to hyperbolic language and often being out of the information loop (not on e-mail) by choice. I'm sure someone will tell me that the reason this is continuing to happen must be because the person obviously has not REALLY been heard, not listened to with respect etc., How about the person who knows they have been heard when the group does as they say, and until the group does the particular action or makes a certain decision they will continue to go on ad nauseum. I.e "I know I have been heard when the group does what I ask". What do you do then? Add to that new members who have not heard the cry before and when they see a member in this state immediately want to fix things for the person. Add this to the already challenging, risky, exhausting, time consuming and stressful development stage and you've got a perfect recipe for head banging. A good friend of mine says that Consensus is a call to maturity. I wholeheartedly agree. Self awareness is sadly lacking in our culture. In my experience using a consensus process when there is not much self awareness present can be extremely frustrating. I'm very much in favour of finding a new model of decision making and do believe that consensus and sociocracy are the models for the future, however..... I really do wish the process worked the way Gail Holmes expresses it: <If they are given space and respect then they will learn to give it back to the group. Things will flow. If they like red and everyone else likes green it still needs to be "heard" and understood. Maybe there is an interesting reason for it.> Sadly in my experience the interesting reason is some old wounding and nothing short of two or three years of intensive therapy will shift it. I'm sounding pretty cynical today I know, ah well where are those rose tinted glasses anyway? Mary Sorehead Shadow Commons Cohousing. Forgive the pseudonym, trying to avoid hurt feelings. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Re: [C-L] Commonhouse Air, (continued)
- Re: Re: [C-L] Commonhouse Air racheli, February 12 2003
- Re: Re: [C-L] Commonhouse Air Elizabeth Stevenson, February 12 2003
- incensed :-) Howard Landman, February 12 2003
- Individuals and groups Rob Sandelin, February 12 2003
- Individual versus group needs and wants Gary Kent, February 11 2003
-
Re: Individual versus group needs and wants Sharon Villines, February 11 2003
- Indiana Cohousing Group Forming Megan Moss, February 11 2003
-
Head-banging & our new "Round-tabling" Manual sbraun, February 12 2003
- Re: [C-L] Consensus and Sociocracy Sharon Villines, February 12 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.