Re: the failure of cohousing in the united states | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:00:37 -0800 (PST) |
First a few comments as list manager. Douglas Stambler is not and has not been a subscriber to cohousing-L and has not tried to subscribe but two messages from him were posted yesterday. First I posted a message for him: > N Calif housing needed for sustainable living student Later Chris quoted the "failure" message which had been sent to a number of people connected with cohousing. Note that the first message from new subscribers is now automatically held for review to prevent spammers from subscribing to post. I dont know what I would have done with this post... Tho his perception of cohousing is far from accurate compared to virtually every knowledgeable observer I know of, please refrain from using loaded terms like "nutcase". Fred, cohousing-L list manager Stepping our of my list manager role... While most of his points are way off, one is close enough to warrant comment. > 2) cohousing in america is elitist - originally an idea from denmark, > the american version of cohousing is only available to the top 10% of > income earners in america - methodically excluding people of color and > the homeless. The cost of cohousing is a problem. While there are some opportunities for people of limited income, I think they are relatively few. Of course the cost of housing in the US is a problem generally. I don't know what percentage of the US population could afford to spend 30% of it's income to live in the median priced cohousing unit, but I suspect it is higher than 10%. Anyone capable of coming up with this (or similar) statistic? Raines, could we come up with the median price of a cohousing unit in the US? I encourage people to keep posting examples of relatively affordable cohousing... Robert Heinich, Eno Commons Cohousing Neighborhood, Durham, NC (after commenting on affordable options there) wrote: > BTW, we have found that the larger houses sell faster than the smaller > design. A big part of the housing problem in the US is a distribution of income problem which may be part of the explanation of this quote. BTW I'm a cohousing 'wannabe' ; I'd like to live in cohousing but I don't. It would probably be more accurate to say I dont want to live in cohousing enough to move far enough or work hard enough to make it happen. Cost is one factor. Life is full of tradeoffs. I have long contended that us cohousing 'wannabes' outnumber the people who actually live in cohousing substantially. Fred -- Fred H. Olson Minneapolis,MN 55411 USA (near north Mpls) Communications for Justice - My new listserv org. UU, Linux My Link Page: http://fholson.cohousing.org Ham radio:WB0YQM fholson at cohousing.org 612-588-9532 (7am-10pm Central time)
- RE: Fwd: the failure of cohousing in the united states, (continued)
-
RE: Fwd: the failure of cohousing in the united states Alexander Robin A, November 16 2004
- RE: Fwd: the failure of cohousing in the united states Carol Burrell, November 16 2004
- "failure"/diversity? Saoirse, November 16 2004
- RE: Fwd: the failure of cohousing in the united states Robert Heinich, November 16 2004
- Re: the failure of cohousing in the united states Fred H Olson, November 16 2004
- Re: Re: the failure of cohousing in the united states Jeanne Goodman, JP Cohousing, November 16 2004
-
The cost of housing, and therefore cohousing Chris ScottHanson, November 18 2004
- Re: The cost of housing, and therefore cohousing Sharon Villines, November 20 2004
- RE: The cost of housing, and therefore cohousing Eileen McCourt, November 21 2004
-
RE: Fwd: the failure of cohousing in the united states Alexander Robin A, November 16 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.