CH use rules - | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: kkudia (kkudia![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:22:19 -0700 (PDT) |
Wayne: For some these are rules you listed...for others its expectations clear and defined...for others, it puts content in what it means to be a neighbor, a good Samaritan, loving friend. Its the balance of form and human freedom. Its a balance between individual freedoms living amongst other with individual freedoms that may differ and at times may cause conflicts because of differences. Not tyranny. Love and mutual respect isn't coercion. Its a free choice to live in community. Isn't that why we desire to live in community? Not necessary even feeling good about oneself for doing good. Love is: "patient and kind; not jealous or boastful; not arrogant or rude...does not insist on its own way; is not irritable or resentful; does not rejoice at wrong, but in the right. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things." Isn't that the ideal we strive on a practical level in our relationships. Of course no one is perfect nor do we live in a perfect world; so there is narcissistic tendencies in us all. I got the sense that what you listed below; is all about loving your neighbor? You gave content, practical examples to it. I also thought Tammy post Parenting is a great example. "This all goes back to my parenting philosophy: have clear expectations and consequences, and then your kids can make their own decisions based on their tolerance for the consequences. " Tammy Karen Anthony Fl in process of downsizing into CoHo community Wayne wrote: "but among the prevalent shared values was (1) courtesy. When one did something for someone else, one felt better about one's self. Except for maybe the town bully, almost no one felt elevated when one failed to extend courtesies, such as (2) holding doors open for others (3) taking care of someone else's chores when they were unable, (4) loaning possessions to those who didn't have needed items (5) stopping for someone crossing the street, which happened frequently in the absence of a pedestrian law, and the like. There is something subtly disrespectful implied by posting rules; it implies that the poster is in a superior position in an hierarchy of coercion and the subject is inferior, in need of instruction from superiors who presume the worst about their subjects, rather than the best." WT
-
CH use rules - Tamara Maher, May 10 2011
- Re: CH use rules - Wayne Tyson, May 11 2011
-
Re: CH use rules - Sharon Villines, May 18 2011
- Re: CH use rules - Wayne Tyson, May 18 2011
- CH use rules - kkudia, May 11 2011
- Re: CH use rules - Wayne Tyson, May 11 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.